$3,000 flat. Twelve months. Full refund if nothing is live.
Half at intake, half the day there is an entity identifier or a live card to show you. No retainer, no monthly, no upsell ladder. Four builds run at a time because the part that takes the months cannot be parallelised by hiring.
Check your own name. The answer changes which of the three routes you are on, and one of the three is much cheaper than this page.
What the money buys, and what it does not
- The full diagnosis, including the honest verdict that you should wait
- Identity work: the three sentences, both bios, the descriptor Google will read
- The brand brain, built and handed to you as a file you keep
- The entity home, built or rebuilt, on your own domain
- Person and Organization schema, wired together, validated
- Every profile aligned to one string
- Search Console, analytics, the instrumentation that makes drift visible
- The corroboration campaign: outreach, briefing, follow-up, twelve months of it
- The claim packet and a rehearsal of the field that gets people rejected
- Quarterly diagnostics for the full twelve months
- Any promise of a date. Google publishes no threshold and takes no applications.
- Paid Wikipedia insertions, bought links, invented citations, synthetic engagement
- Anything touching your government identity documents or verification selfie
- A Wikidata item where the notability bar is not genuinely cleared
- Writing your actual body of work for you. Evidence has to be true first.
Twelve months from intake, if there is no live entity record and no panel, the full $3,000 comes back. Not a credit, not a rollover. This is survivable only because roughly a third of applicants are told not to start.
The order of work
Skipping a step is the most common cause of failure, because every later step depends on an earlier one being true.
We run the diagnosis before you pay anything past the deposit: the nine queries, the Knowledge Graph lookup, the namesake count, and a baseline of what three AI assistants currently say about you. If that comes back saying wait, we say wait and you keep the rest of your money.
Who you are. What you stand for. What result you drive, for whom. In plain language, no adjectives. If you cannot answer these three, nothing downstream can broadcast an identity nobody has decided on, and this is where about a third of engagements pause.
One private file holding every fact anyone will ever need to state about you: the identity line, two bios at two lengths, dates, registrations, the master headshot and the image stack, transcripts, case studies with names and results, every profile you hold. Every surface we build reads from this. Missing facts here are exactly where wrong facts come from later.
One canonical site on your own name, separate from your company site and linked both ways, with the identity line as the first paragraph and the master headshot above the fold. Person schema on it, Organization schema on the company site, wired to each other. This is the machine-readable layer you fully control, and it does most of what people wrongly hope Wikidata will do.
Every profile made identical: name spacing, headshot file, the first eight words of the headline, the city, the first bio line, one link format. Search Console verified on an account you will still control in five years, because that same account is required for the claim later.
The part that cannot be automated and is the reason this takes months. Independent people and organisations naming you, in public, in places Google already crawls, at the intersection of your trade and your city. Three to five of each. This is the pattern that cannot be faked and the one Google is looking for.
When the panel appears, you claim it. Three dots, claim this knowledge panel, get verified. We prepare the whole packet and rehearse the one field that gets people rejected. You submit it, from your own account, with your own documents. We never touch your identity papers.
Panels drift. Descriptors change, images get replaced, a namesake gets a burst of press. The quarterly check is nine queries, a Knowledge Graph re-read, and a fresh baseline against three AI assistants, so drift gets caught in weeks instead of at the point where a client notices.
Five hours a month
Roughly: one hour on the brand brain in month one, then two podcast or interview slots a month at about ninety minutes each including prep. Everything else is ours. The claim at the end takes you fifteen minutes and cannot be delegated.
What moves firstThe AI assistants usually name you before Google shows a panel, because they read the same evidence with a lower bar. That is the first signal the work is landing, and it usually arrives around month three.
Who this is for, and who gets turned away
Refusing a doomed engagement is cheaper than an eighteen-month refund. It is also the only reason the refund above can exist.
- You can name three things you have actually done that a stranger could verify without your help.
- Somebody who is not you, and not on your payroll, has written about or interviewed you in the last two years.
- You will sit for content: podcasts, talks, written pieces. Five hours a month, not fifty.
- You own, or are willing to buy, a domain on your own name.
- You have one Google account you will still control in five years.
- You want the box and not the evidence behind it. That order does not work and cannot be made to work.
- Your public record is thin and you need this to be live in three months.
- You want us to write a Wikipedia article about you. We do not, and a deleted one leaves you worse off than never trying.
- You want us to hold your identity documents. Nobody should.
- You are hoping this repairs a reputation problem. It makes you easier to find, including the parts you would rather nobody found.
The record, again, because it is the argument
| Name | Where it stands | Google’s descriptor | Entity ID | Origin | Verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandeep Tiku CTO, DAZN Group |
Stage 2 · on their name | Chief technology officer of DAZN | /g/11n88rs3s0 |
Built | Google ↗ |
| Harsh Pamnani Author and brand strategist |
Stage 2 · on their name | Author | /g/11f0z6v3zr |
Built | Google ↗ |
| Rohit Bassi Author, speaker, investor |
Stage 2 · on their name | Investor | /g/11gbh01wq4 |
Built | Google ↗ |
| Wanuri Kahiu Film director and producer |
Stage 2 · on their name | Kenyan film director | /m/09gps9j |
Worked on | Google ↗ |
| Himani Kankaria Founder, Missive Digital |
Stage 1 · entity live | Writer | /g/11rggfbxt1 |
Built | Google ↗ |
| Katerina Khramova Actress and dancer |
Stage 1 · entity live | Actress, storyteller, speaker | /g/11f0zrgtrz |
Built | Google ↗ |
| Sagar Kathrotiya Podcast host |
Stage 1 · entity live | Host, The Sagar Kathrotiya Show | /g/11ld4h_jsy |
Built | Google ↗ |
| Ramesh Pattni DPhil (Oxon), psychologist |
Stage 1 · entity live | Psychologist and scholar | /g/11kpwvj02p |
Built | Google ↗ |
Captured 31 August 2026 from an Indian IP address with the interface language set to English. Panels vary by country and by the searcher, so what you see may differ. Every row links to the exact search that produced its screenshot.
Four at a time
Email works better than a form here, because the first thing we need is not your budget, it is your name spelled the way it appears on things.
bksarkhedi78@gmail.com
- Your full name, spelled exactly as it should appear
- What you do, in one sentence, without adjectives
- Your city
- Three things a stranger could verify about you without your help
- Links to anything written about you by somebody who is not you
- Your website, if you have one
You get the diagnosis back either way, including if the answer is that you should not start yet.